Important news from Iran and the region

Friday, November 3, 2017


Iranian people are key to the success of new U.S. strategy to deal with Tehran’s threats

11/2/2017 8:50:45 PM
Iran missiles

Iran missiles

By Homeira Hesami 

Augusta Free Press,  November 2, 2017 - When the nuclear deal between Iran and the P5+1 world powers was engineered by the Obama administration in 2015, the globe was cloaked in a false security blanket. Last June, unsurprisingly, the National Council of Resistance of Iran ( NCRI ) in Washington, DC revealed disturbingly current details concerning the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps’ (IRGC) both testing and launching ballistic missiles. Such evidence demonstrates that Iran’s clerical regime had no intention of curbing its agenda. What to do?
Before we ask “how ” we must ask “why?”
Simply put by U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, “Judging any international agreement begins and ends with the nature of the government that signed it.”
 
As far as the “nature” of the Iranian Regime is concerned, its resume boasts the 1983 bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, its status as a number-one killer of U.S. troops in Iraq, and preeminence as the executioner of thousands of its own citizens. Given these “accomplishments,” what exactly were we expecting when we handed Iran the pen?
U.S. President Donald Trump recognized this in his announced Iran strategy: “… in just a few years, as key restrictions disappear, Iran can sprint towards a rapid nuclear weapons breakout… What is the purpose of a deal that, at best, only delays Iran’s nuclear capability for a short period of time?”
President Trump is very much aware of Iran’s violent track record. Per his September 19th UNGA address: “The Iranian government masks a corrupt dictatorship behind the false guise of a democracy. It [is] an economically depleted rogue state whose chief exports are violence, bloodshed, and chaos.”


As Trump goes on to stress, the Iranian people are chief among Iran’s victims. While the world has justifiably focused on Tehran’s efforts to acquire nuclear and ballistic missile technology, its domestic policies have been overlooked. In his most recent speech, President Trump again recognized the oppression of Iran’s people: “The United States is far from the only target of the Iranian dictatorship’s long campaign of bloodshed. The regime violently suppresses its own citizens.”
After the mullahs won power, arrests and executions of dissidents began. The incarcerations and executions have continued, targeting journalists, artists, and musicians, among others. Iranian youth are routinely charged with capital crimes, sometimes for “offenses” as trivial as posting on banned platforms, like Facebook and Twitter.
In his report to the UN General Assembly earlier this year, the Secretary-General cited a particularly gruesome massacre: “Between July and August 1988, thousands of political prisoners, men, women, and teenagers, were reportedly executed pursuant to a fatwa issued by the then Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khomeini.”
Approximately 30,000 political prisoners, primarily activists of the main Iranian opposition movement, the Mujahedin-e Khalq (PMOI or MEK), were charged solely with dissent against the theocratic regime, and then slaughtered.
Many political leaders deserve praise for standing with the Iranian people and opposition efforts to bring democratic change to Iran. Senator John McCain paved the way earlier this year, traveling to Tirana, Albania to meet with Maryam Rajavi , head of the NCRI. Following his lead, a senior delegation of U.S. senators– Roy Blunt and Majority Whip John Cornyn, members of the Select Intelligence Committee, along with Thom Tillis of the Armed Services Committee–made the trip this past August
Similarly, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich recently remarked that cooperation between the United States and the Iranian opposition is crucial. Gingrich said that he hoped the current administration would “reach out [to the NCRI] in a much more collaborative way to coordinate information and to coordinate advice and find ways to work together.” Speaking of Maryam Rajavi, he said that “she is one of the examples of a symbol of resistance to the dictatorship.”
It is high time we acknowledge that the Iranian regime will never be willing to modify its agenda for the sake of our peace of mind. The regime, in its entirety, has an appallingly lengthy record of terrorism and unimaginable crimes against humanity and has committed multiple breaches of the Nuclear Deal. The change will come not from within this decrepit theocracy, but from without. The dictatorship’s fear of this impending change is warranted. Put accurately by Trump in his recent address, “The entire world understands that the good people of Iran want change… Iran’s people are what their leaders fear the most.”
Ms. Hesami is the president of the Iranian-American Community of North Texas, a member of the Organization of Iranian-American Communities.

ANALYSIS: Why Obama’s mistakes in the Middle East should never be repeated

11/2/2017 7:40:25 PM
Obama speaks at the Obama Foundation Summit in Chicago on November 1, 2017

Obama speaks at the Obama Foundation Summit in Chicago on November 1, 2017

By Tony Duheaume
Al Arabiya, 2 November 2017 - For decades, the US took military action against states it deemed were a threat to it; but it has refrained from taking any military action against Iran – even though the latter’s radical leadership has actively supported terrorist activities against the US and its allies.
Using proxy forces, the Iranian regime has exported terror since its creation to both the Middle East and the West, claiming many lives over the years. Although Iran is also known to be behind the deaths of many coalition soldiers in Iraq, through its supply of weapons and training to terror groups, the US and Iran have continued to cooperate with each other on the grounds of stabilising Iraq.
According to both sides, the aim of this cooperation has been to stave off an all-out civil war and unite the country behind a government of unity – none of which has been fully achieved, mainly due to Iran’s meddling.

Iraq turns satellite state

In reality, Iran’s interference in Iraqi affairs since the fall of Saddam Hussein has turned the state of Iraq into a virtual Iranian satellite. With the fall of ISIS as a ground force, Iranian military leaders have cleverly merged infamous Shia militias into the Iraqi armed forces, thereby effectively taking control of the country’s military.
Saddam was taken down by a US coalition on concocted evidence of producing WMDs. However, Iran has got scot-free although there is indisputable evidence that it has been pursuing nuclear weapons for decades, that its leaders have directed acts of terrorism against both the West and its Gulf State neighbours, and that it has instigated foreign wars that act in the interest of its hegemonic pursuits, using both its Quds Force and foreign proxies like Hezbollah.
It isn’t a case of whether military action would have been the right course to take against Iran, it comes down to the fact that other neighbouring countries have experienced the wrath of Western aggression – including Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya – while Iran has got off very lightly. Not only has the regime been treated with kid gloves, it has managed to build up its military might beyond its wildest dreams – through billions of dollars returned to it through the Iran nuclear deal.
Then with its extensively updatedwar machine and internal security apparatus becoming more powerful by the day, Iran was invited to go to war against ISIS by the Iraqi government, thereby giving it the opportunity for its complete takeover. With the Obama administration determined not to place a substantial number of boots on the ground, Iran’s intervention was seen as a blessing, and through this intervention Iran has now been able to effectively annex both Iraq and Syria.

 John Kerry, foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany and EU foreign policy chief, said that Iran deserves the sanctions relief it’s due under last year’s landmark nuclear deal.
John Kerry, foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany and EU foreign policy chief, said that Iran deserves the sanctions relief it’s due under last year’s landmark nuclear deal.


Obama’s mishandling

Under the Obama administration, the US left Iraq in great haste. Similarly, Obama turned his back on Syria, when it would have made sense for him to back opposition rebels and introduce a no-fly zone in order to turn the war in rebel’s favour and bring down the tyrant, Bashar al-Assad.
As the Syrian crisis worsened, Obama’s partial approach towards Iran culminated in the nuclear Deal — which has only stalled the regime’s progress towards building a nuclear weapon as it can always revive it at any time it wants. However, vast amount of Iran’s frozen assets have been restored to it, which has made it a richer, more powerful nation, which can pursue military and missile programs.
By making a handful of insignificant gestures to the Obama administration, Iran’s leaders eventually gave the US virtually nothing in return.As far as Iran is concerned, it has gained prestige across the globe, and even now that Donald Trump’s administration is confronting the problem at its source, Europe continues to hang on to the deal, through which Iran will be to pursue its dream of building nuclear weapons at any time.
When the war in Syria was at its height, Assad used chemical weapons against civilians. For his part, Obama threatened Assad with a red line and with hollow threats of military action. However, Russians soon sidelined the US by forging another humiliating deal, through which Assad agreed to give up his chemical weapons and the US backed down from taking any retaliatory action against Syria.
With this deal being brokered by Syria’s ally Russia, Assad agreed to “give up” his stocks of chemical weapons, as long as the US agreed not to carry out air strikes against him. He also demanded other concessions for his chemical weapons manufacturing sites.
Just as Obama left enough caveats in the deal with Iran for the latter to be able to later revive its nuclear weapons program, Assad was left with underground facilities with which he can still use to continue his chemical weapons program at a time of his choosing. Following this deal, Assad went on to pummel Syria into rubble, slaughtering hundreds of thousands of his own people, and leaving millions to flee the country. In fact, he continued to use chemical weapons on civilians.

A lopsided deal

As regards the nuclear deal, Iran entered into an agreement with the West over putting a freeze on its nuclear program, as well as on ensuring that its 9,500 centrifuges would continue to remain idle in two uranium enrichment plants. Iran agreed that it would stop enriching uranium to the 20 per cent purity (which would be close to weapons grade), and any existing stockpiles coming into that category would be converted into harmless oxide.
In lieu of its compliance, the deal provided for reducing sanctions on Iran and on certain items (like on gold and chemical exports) there’s provision for suspending sanctions altogether. The deal has also made several services exempt of sanctions, and has provisions for more relief in future, even as the freeze on billions of dollars in Iran’s frozen assets gets lifted.
This agreement works perfectly for Iran. With its new-found respectability among other nations, it will be able to make lucrative deals, keep up the pretence of respectability, rebuild its economy, strengthen its armed forces, and enter into trade with a multitude of nations that will eventually be willing to stand by it. At a later stage, when the Iranian leadership believes it has gained the trust of the world, it shall revive its nuclear program and the mullah’s dream of creating a nuke will eventually be realised.
With Iran’s wealth, prestige and power being restored through its trade deals across the world and having Russia as an ally, the ruling clerics plan to make the regime a force to reckon with on the world stage and make its hold on the Middle East irreversible in order to fulfil Khomeini’s dream of knocking the US off its perch as guardian of the Middle East.
It is almost as though the West had been building up to the day when Iran would become the predominant power of the Middle East. Through the nuclear deal, the West appears to be inviting Iran to return to the international fold, with the hope that the theocratic republic would become an ally of the West rather than an enemy.

 President Trump speaks about the Iran nuclear deal in the White House in Washington, on October 13, 2017.
President Trump speaks about the Iran nuclear deal in the White House in Washington, on October 13, 2017.


Trump travails for Iran


With all of the talk in Western media on how Iran is adhering to the nuclear deal, there is hardly a mention of the regime’s murders and other crimes against its own people. Nobody mentions its system of carrying out arbitrary arrests, torture and execution, as the jury of greedy speculators decide to be one-sided in this matter.
During Obama’s presidency, Iranian leaders felt they were negotiating from a position of strength over the nuclear issue. In their eyes, Barack Obama was a weak president, who being in trouble at home, with his popularity on the wane due to a litany of failed domestic policies, needed to prove himself to the American people on the world stage.
But with this deal only delaying Iran’s ability to produce nuclear weapons, with much of its secretive projects now going deep into the mountainous underground bunkers, Iranian boffins are certain to be further ahead with their nuclear program than the rest of the world realises.
So with some intelligence reports suggesting the IRGC may already have a nuclear weapons capability, with nukes that can fit on the long-range missiles they are developing, the future looks bleak.
While Obama was in the White House, the Iranian regime felt America had gone soft. It also strongly believed that the US was losing its credibility as the guardian of the world. It even harboured the notion that Iran is growing in strength and once it has acquired nuclear weapons, it would attain superpower status. As a revolutionary force, it will then become unstoppable.
However, with Donald Trump now in the White House, Iran’s uncertainty over its nuclear program is rising, and with his plans to decertify the nuclear agreement with Iran, Trump is proving to Iran that America is no pushover, and is a force to be reckoned with.

 Tony Duheaume
Tony Duheaume 


Video: IRAN’S SECRET FUNDING FOR AL-QAEDA IN EXCHANGE FOR ATTACKS ON U.S. TARGETS EXPOSED IN BIN LADEN FILES

11/2/2017 7:03:58 PM
Osama bin Laden is seen in this video footage recorded at an undisclosed location in Afghanistan in 2001; files from his Pakistan compound have revealed al-Qaedas ties with Iran

Osama bin Laden is seen in this video footage recorded at an undisclosed location in Afghanistan in 2001; files from his Pakistan compound have revealed al-Qaedas ties with Iran

Newsweek, November 2, 2017 - Iranian offers of secret funding, arms and training to al-Qaeda have been laid bare in a 19-page document declassified by the C.I.A. that shows how Tehran provided extensive support for the terror group in an effort to weaken the United States.
The previously unseen document,  released with 470,000 files recovered in the raid on Osama Bin Laden’s Abbottabad  compound in May 2011, gives an assessment of al-Qaeda’s relationship with Iran, according to a senior jihadist in the group.

Translations by the Long War Journal,  which chronicles the U.S. war on terror, have shown how Iran offered the “Saudi brothers” in al-Qaeda “everything they needed” if they were to carry out strikes on U.S. interests in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf. This aid extended to  “money, arms” and “training in Hezbollah camps in Lebanon,” the documents explain.
In other instances it can be seen that Iran provided logistical assistance to al-Qaeda, facilitating travel for some operatives and providing safe houses for others. Prior to the 9/11 attacks, Tehran provided safe-haven for prominent ideologue Abu Hafs al-Mauritani and his followers in Iran.
Relations were often fractious between the Sunni al-Qaeda and Shiite Iran,  even if both recognized they were never in open war that their “interests intersect” on the issue of their shared classification as an “enemy of America.”
At one point Al-Qaeda contacted Ayatollah Khamenei directly, demanding the release of prisoners in Iranian custody. Other files, previously released, have shown how Bin Laden cautioned being overly antagonistic towards Iran which he personally described as al-Qaeda’s “main artery for funds, personnel and communication.”
The Abbotabad files formed part of the U.S. strategy for targeting al-Qaeda’s source of wealth and operational aid coming from Iran.
Speaking last month at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies in Washington, C.I.A. Director Mike Pompeo said  al-Qaeda and Iran had built complex ties.“It’s an open secret and not classified information that there have been relationships, there are connections,” he said. “There have been times the Iranians have worked alongside al-Qaeda,” the C.I.A. director added.
Pompeo said the relationships between al-Qaeda and Iran, whose origins are outlined in the documents such as those released by the C.I.A., continue be placed under close surveillance especially in Syria where the two sides are directly opposed.

Support The Voice Of The Iranian People In Face Of Tyranny

11/3/2017 9:13:46 AM
INTV fundraising tehthon

INTV fundraising tehthon

 It is illegal to own satellite receiver equipment in Iran, where the government exerts tremendous control over the flow of information. Nevertheless, just as countless Iranians use virtual proxy networks to evade restrictions on the government and social media, millions of Iranian households also use satellite equipment to tune into banned television networks. Many even go so far as to re-acquire the necessary equipment after it has been confiscated by regime authorities in large-scale crackdowns.
The Iranian regime is well-known for attacking not only the recipients of independent and foreign information but also the broadcasters themselves. In fact, it has been widely reported that the Iranian crackdown on free minded journalists has been escalating in recent years, along with a broader crackdown on activists and minority groups. These conditions make the work of dissenting news outlets more important than ever, as they counter Iran’s attempt to control the media and also expose both the popular protests and the suppressive activities that would otherwise go unreported.
One such outlet, known inFarsi as Simay Azadi and in English as Iran National Television, will start its 22nd public campaign on Friday, November 3 to raise funds for its operations. INTV is viewed by many of those households that have defied the regime’s ban on satellite television equipment.

INTV is uniquely a voice for the Iranian people.



Far beyond harassment and interrogation, contributors to INTV have been tortured and even executed for their journalist activities, just as Iranian activists have been executed solely for supporting the main opposition group, the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK).
Violence against INTV journalists goes hand-in-hand with violence against PMOI activists, because one of INTV’s most prominent affronts to the Iranian regime is its coverage of popular protests. Over the years, the network has also helped to expose to conditions of Iranian prisons and particularly their political wards, and INTV has become a chosen outlet for Iranian political prisoners to voice their continued opposition to the clerical regime.
Such projects have contributed to the growing popularity of INTV among Iranians with an eye toward a democratic future for their country. The network’s previous pledge drive took place for 40 consecutive hours in mid-January and thousands of people in Iran and throughout the world called in and contributed to its efforts. As in previous fundraising efforts, individual contributions ranged from just a few dollars to many thousands, underscoring the socioeconomic diversity of the network’s audience.
Their contributions and their continued viewership of the network highlighted the ongoing defiance of bans on dissident and foreign media. And the pledge drive itself also helped to highlight the continuation of the people’s conflict with the regime over other attempts to restrict access to information and domestic communication. Viewers and supporters kept up dialogue over the mission of INTV on several social media outlets including Facebook, Twitter, and Telegram, as well as reaching the network directly via 84 phone lines.

Support The Voice Of The Iranian People In Fact Of Tyranny
 Support The Voice Of The Iranian People In Fact Of Tyranny

Callers praised INTV as “the voice of the voiceless” and cited a number of specific topics of reporting as reasons for their support of INTV as a primary alternative to state media and propaganda. These included the apparent escalation in human rights abuses throughout the country, as well as the enforced public silence over the past crimes of the clerical regime. INTV has played a major role in the campaign for full public disclosure of the details behind the execution of 30,000 political prisoners in the summer of 1988, with which the regime sought to destroy the PMOI and all organized resistance to the fledgling theocracy.
Public dialogue about that incident increased dramatically over the past year, in the wake of the release of an audio recording of Ayatollah Ali Hossein Montazeri criticizing his then-fellow regime officials over their role in the killings. In the face of government efforts to suppress the recording, INTV helped to circulate the growing calls for justice for the victims and exposing mass graves of the victims while also reporting on the protests that emerged out of that and the regime’s cavalier response to the information. Mostafa Pourmohammadi, who was Justice Minister during Hassan Rouhani’s first term as president, said that he was “proud” to have helped carry out “God’s command” of death for the MEK.
The renewed public awareness of this issue has given another outlet to the already well-established disconnect between the Iranian government and its people. INTV stands to fill an important role in the months and years to come as it shows the depths of the people’s antipathy to the regime while also exposing the various reasons why that antipathy is justified.
This is a role that INTV’s contributors and its volunteer staff are prepared to play in spite of the severe risks that accompany their work. All independent voices in the media face serious risks as a result of simply doing their jobs. But when it comes to Iran, for no one is this truer than those who unabashedly convey information to the public about the growth and progress of the Iranian Resistance movement and popular dissent.
The government’s crackdown will continue to escalate, but recent experience has shown that this cannot be expected to silence the dissent of the Iranian people, least of all when there is still an outlet through which they can voice their dissent against the clerical regime while also seeing the fruits of their labor as activists and dissidents.
With its viewership growing and its 22nd pledge drive about to begin, INTV is hopeful that it will soon be able to guarantee its position as such an outlet for another year.